The Demise of Homan and the Rise of Junk Science
January 20, 2008
In October of 2000, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled in State v. Homan that the battery of tests more commonly known as Standardized Field Sobriety Tests were inherently unreliable predictors of intoxication unless they were given in strict compliance with the NHTSA guidelines. As such, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled that the results of tests not conducted in strict compliance with the NHTSA guidelines must be supressed from the evidence in any case.
This was an extremely controversial ruling amongst police officers, prosecutors, and Mothers Against Drunk Drivers. But the Ohio Supreme Court wasn’t going out on much of a limb. The NHTSA’s own manual which sets up the three standardized field sobriety tests, the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus Test, the Walk and Turn Test, and the One Leg Stand Test plainly states that any deviation, no matter how slight from the instructions in the manual compromises the integrity of the tests.
But the Ohio Legislature wasn’t going to sit back and allow the Ohio Supreme Court to determine what evidence it would and wouldn’t consider. They passed a law which said that standardized field sobriety testing done in substantial (rather than strict) compliance was admissible at trial.
Back in the old days, a judge would have snorted something about separation of powers and how legislatures routinely prove that any goddamned wallpaper hanger can be a legislator and found the law unconstitutional. But in today’s era of shy judges, much of the power of the judicial branch was simply handed over to the Legislature in the Ohio Supreme Court’s recent ruling in State of Ohio v. Bocsar.
In that case, the Ohio Supreme Court found that while courts of Ohio did have the power to fashion rules of evidence, that the rule from Homan that strict compliance with NHTSA guidelines was required was not a rule of evidence. Never have so many worked so hard to give up so much.
Just what basis the Legislature had for saying that substantial compliance with the NHTSA tests reliable when the NHTSA books themselves say that it doesn’t has never been revealed to us. But perhaps if the Legislature enacts a bill that says water runs up hill we should all start building hydroelectric plans on mountain tops.
Of course Mark Twain must be given the last word (or two). He said: “No man’s wallet is safe while the legislature is in session.” He also said that: “Figures don’t lie, but liars figure.”




Comments
Got something to say?